What’s New for SQF Code Ed. 7

Originally posted on SQFI.com.


The issuance of a sixth version of the Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) Guidance Document in January 2011 presented the SQF Institute with an opportunity to review and update the SQF 1000 and 2000 codes. The decision was made to combine the SQF 1000 and 2000 codes into one code, including modules for all industry scopes identified in the sixth edition of the GFSI Guidance Document.
The SQF Code Ed. 7 continues to recognize the system elements in an independent module (module 2) that is required for all operations undergoing an SQF audit. In addition to the system elements, the operation must comply with the module that reflects its food sector category (modules 3-15). The modules follow the same food sector categories as in the GFSI Guidance Document; however, the modules better reflect Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs) and Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) of the industry being audited. For example, there is a separate module for farming of produce and farming of animals. Additionally, packaging and distribution each have their own module.
Major changes:
  • Contract manufacturers and product development are now auditable at Levels 2 and 3
  • Allergen management, approved suppliers and training are a part of the system elements
  • Glossary, logo usage rules and food sector categories are included in the code
  • Site design and prerequisite programs (sections 5 and 6) have been combined to remove redundancies
  • Some system elements are mandatory
  • GAPs include elements of the United Harmonization Standard
  • Clause added on continuous improvement
  • Clause added for Environmental Monitoring Program for high-risk processes
  • Scoring of Opportunities for Improvement (OIPs) has been removed; a simplified scoring system has been incorporated instead
  • Recertification date is now tied to the date of the audit
  • Auditor and certification body criteria have been revised
A map between modules 2, 7 and 11 and their corresponding 1000 and 2000 elements can be found here.

Harmonized Standard - Confusion Surrounds GLOBALG.A.P Adoption

A common theme recently has been the confusion between the Harmonized Standard and when GLOBALG.A.P adopted it as the National Interpretation Guideline.  To help make this clearer, GLOBALG.A.P released a statement, and the following excerpt may help clear up any questions:


We have created a subset of the GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) version 4. Standard, called the GLOBALG.A.P. Produce Safety Version 4 Standard.


The new Produce Safety Standard contains only the food safety Control Points and Compliance
Criteria (CPPCs) from the GLOBALG.A.P. IFA Version 4. The CPCCs have not changed and are
identical to the CPCCs found in the GLOBALG.A.P. IFA Version 4. Only the environmental,
workers safety and welfare related CPCCs have been removed.


The GLOBALG.A.P. Produce Safety Version 4 Standard is the collection of those CPPCs from the
GLOBALG.A.P. IFA standard, which fulfill the requirements of the GFSI Guidance Document
Version 6.


We allow all our accredited CBs to certify the GLOBALG.A.P. Produce Safety Standard. The
GLOBALG.A.P. General Regulations apply and there are no specific qualification requirements for
inspectors and auditors.


As the Produce Safety Version 4 Standard is just an excerpt of the existing accredited IFA
standard, the GLOBALG.A.P. Produce Safety Version 4 Standard shall not require new
accreditation assessment by the AB. We kindly ask you to allow your GLOBALG.A.P. accredited
CBs to issue GLOBALG.A.P. Produce Safety Standard certificate with your AB logo.

SQF releases version 7 for public comment

The draft revised SQF Code has just been released for public comment.  This has been released with a view to replace the existing SQF 1000 & 2000 Standard.  The Code has undergone a major revision to achieve the following objectives:

  • Ensure the SQF Code meets the requirements of the GFSI Guidance Document edition 6;
  • Remove duplication and repetition in the SQF Codes;
  • Clarify areas of concern or ambiguity in the SQF Codes.

As a result, SQF 2000 and SQF 1000 has been combined into one – the SQF Code edition 7.

System elements (module 2) will apply to all certified businesses, with GAP/GMP modules customized by industry sector.  Suppliers will only be expected to implement the module(s) that apply to their industry sectors.

Changes and comments to the standard are being invited and any comments should be sent to info@sqfi.com.  Those interested in reviewing the code should email info@sqfi.com for the most recent version.

SQF releases CB statistics - NCSI performs very well.

SQF has released performance statistics for each CB based on a limited data set.  We're pleased that the information given to us is reflecting the effort that NCSI has put into service, with NCSI at the top of the pile for 'Audit finished to certification' at just 19 days.

For our clients, this means that they receive their certification quicker than other Certification Bodies - and we're proud that we can continue to offer such efficient service.

A copy of the report is obtainable by contacting NCSI - info@ncsiamericas.com

BRC Global Standard for Food Safety - Issue 6


The revised BRC Global Standard for Food Safety – Issue 6 is due to publish in July 2011 and will be a requirement for audits from January 2012.

The Standard has been updated to provide increased emphasis on good manufacturing practice and ensures that the requirements of manufacturers and retailers are met.

http://email.tsoshop.co.uk/rp/48/process.clsp?EmailId=98300&Token=207AAFB994EFE1A48631FD5854C00FA95

Pulsed light poised for wider industry adoption

http://www.foodproductiondaily.com/Quality-Safety/Pulsed-light-poised-for-wider-industry-adoption


By Rory Harrington, 24-Jun-2011

Take up of pulsed light (PL) as a decontamination technique is set to take off over the next few years as food companies increasingly realise its safety, cost and environmental benefits, said a leading French research institute.
In the first part of our special edition on dry decontamination technology, FoodProductionDaily.com looks at the prospects, challenges and developments in the PL field for food processing and packaging players.

Great potential

Dr Cecile Lacoste, project manager at the Centre Technique de la Conservation de Produits Agricole (CTCPA), said much of the PL technology has already been developed and was waiting for industry to recognize the huge potential it offers in order to spur faster and more widespread commercial adoption.

Pulsed light systems expose food or packaging surfaces to intense bursts of white light, which have a lethal effect on micro-organisms such as bacteria, spores, yeast and moulds.

While there are a number of commercial applications, particularly in packaging lines – with companies such as Claranor and Montena already well-established – Dr Lacoste said she believed PL would achieve wider acceptance in the medium term.

She was particularly referring to its use on foods such as eggs and meat and said systems, currently in the pipeline, could be brought to market within two years if industry interest was keen enough.

“Once the first few systems are installed commercially, word will spread among companies,” she added. “I think we will see real growth in take up of the technology within two or three years as it has great potential.”

As well as applications to sterilise food and packaging, PL can also be used to decontaminate clear liquids, said the expert. This means that not only can it be used for some beverage products but also across a raft of sectors to cleanse waste water in food processing plants, doing away with the need to used chemicals.


“We believe this application has huge potential benefits for the food processing industry given the focus companies are putting on reducing their water usage,” added Dr Lacoste.

She said that it is also cost effective and forecast that the technology could be cheaper to use than chemicals within a few years.

Take up of the technology could also have been curbed by the global recession in 2008, making industry player more cautious in investing in a novel technology, suggested Dr Lacoste.

Aseptic applications?

The regular surfaces offered by packaging and closures means that PL has been more widely adopted in this sector - with regular developments coming through.

French company Claranor has been successfully developing systems deploying the technology for the decontamination of closures and cups since 2004.

Morgane Busnel, marketing manager, said it had focussed more on packaging because of the challenges presented by using the technique on foods. The irregular surfaces of foodstuffs made it more difficult to ensure full exposure to PL blasts.

There have also been questions over whether products treated with pulsed light should be subject to the Novel Food Regulation, with companies faced with submitting dossiers to prove that the process had not altered the food’s structure in a fundamental way, she added

Busnel stressed, however, that the company was open to developing PL systems for food, citing a project it was currently involved in with a leading European beverage producer to decontaminate sugar syrup.

However, the majority of their attention remained on packaging – initially beverage and, in the last two years, expanding into dairy.

Its PL techniques were currently able to realise microbial reductions of between 3 and 5 log on bacteria and moulds, said Busnel

“This means our technology now complies with industrial requirements for packaging for refrigerated products in the dairy sector such as drinking yoghurts and milk, as well as fresh juices,” she explained.

The company is now seeking to enhance the technology for use in aseptic processing, she said.

“In order to do this we need to be able to deliver reductions of six log,” she added. “It would mean it could be used in the production of shelf stable products such as UHT milk and fruit juices.”

She said it could also be used in flavoured waters and could allow the development of “more authentic” products with reduced levels of preservatives.

Claranor has partnered with the French industry innovation institute to reach the goal and is confident the technology will be realised within the next two years.

So Many Standards...

Within the food sector, there are a number of competing privately owned standards which are GFSI benchmarked, as well as some which are not GFSI benchmarked.  Organizations who set out to achieve certification can find that choosing the best standard that fits their particular operation can be a very time consuming and frustrating process.

Drawing upon our experience, NCSI in conjunction with NQA, have created a short multiple choice quiz asking a variety of questions.  Based on the responses inputted by the user, a set of results identifying standards that may be an appropriate fit for your industry and operation and displayed.

The quiz will be available online shortly at both the NCSI and NQA websites.